close menu
Has DNA Testing Identified Jack the Ripper?

Has DNA Testing Identified Jack the Ripper?

Naming Jack the Ripper is the title of a new book hitting shelves September 9th, and it claims to solve some of the most haunting murders since the nineteenth century. Though theories — conspiracy and otherwise — have circulated about the true identity of Jack the Ripper’s string of gruesome murders in and around the Whitechapel district of London in 1888, so far no direct evidence has been able to link one identity in the intervening 126 years. The new book claims the true killer was Aaron Kosminski, a Polish-born hair dresser who has long been included in the official suspect roster, using recovered DNA evidence.

Between September and November 1888, five women were brutally murdered in the impoverished Whitechapel district. (Though many stories of Jack the Ripper claim eleven victims, frequent unrest and violence in the city may have inflated the number of murders attributed to The Ripper. Police reports believe the serial killer could only claim five.) These five women were all found with slashed throats and mutilated abdomens, which the killer had removed internal organs from before abandoning the bodies.

When businessman Russell Edwards purchased a shawl directly connected to one of the crime scenes (and its victim) in 2007 — a shawl that Ripper enthusiasts debate the authenticity of — he did so with the idea that he may be able to find new evidence and unravel the historic case with the help of DNA testing (after watching Johnny Depp’s film From Hell). The shawl allegedly belonged to Catherine Eddowes, Jack the Ripper’s fourth victim, and was only at auction because it had passed into private hands from the police evidence files. The shawl had supposedly survived all these years without ever being cleaned and still bore blood and bodily fluids from the crime scene.

Edwards contracted the help of Dr. Jari Louhelainen, a leading expert in genetic evidence and senior lecturer in molecular biology at Liverpool John Moores University, to both extract and examine genetic material from the century-old fabric. The only genetic comparisons the duo were able to make involved tracing the matrilineal genetic data — contained in mitochondria, our cells’ symbiotic power stations — left behind with samples they obtained from both a descendant of Eddowes and a descendant of Kosminski’s sister (who would have shared maternal genetic information with the serial killer). It was through these comparisons that Louhelainen directly linked Kosminski’s DNA with cells on the shawl as well as the victim Catherine Eddowes.

Though the evidence pointing in Kosminski’s direction is presented strongly, keep in mind that criminal historians, researchers and passionate Ripper experts have been proclaiming new “positive identifications” of Jack the Ripper on an almost yearly basis. The news of the identification premiered exclusively in the UK’s well-known tabloid Daily Mail this Sunday, and while it has spread like wildfire on the web and in Ripper enthusiast communities, already questions are being asked about validity by scientific and journalistic communities.

Let’s approach this like real forensic scientists. First, the authenticity of the shawl is in question. Second, the genetic analysis that Dr. John Moores conducted relied on evidence that should have long since degraded — 126 year-old skin and sperm cells. To get around this, Moores invented his own method, which isn’t explained. Third, none of the new Jack the Ripper evidence has been published, reviewed, or critiqued by outside experts. Lastly, Edwards chose to make a gigantic historical reveal a book deal, without covering his bases with outside experts first. If we were Scotland Yard, we would definitely be excited, but skeptical.

We can’t wait to see how the forensic community reacts to Edwards’ claims in the weeks to come. Even if the mystery of Jack the Ripper is finally put to rest — Kosminski has been dead since 1919 — we suspect the Ripper’s legend will continue to inspire storytellers for years to come.

IMAGE: Historic-UK.com

STAR WARS: THE LAST JEDI (Spoiler-Free Review)

STAR WARS: THE LAST JEDI (Spoiler-Free Review)

article
9 Actors Who Should Play Batman if Ben Affleck Leaves

9 Actors Who Should Play Batman if Ben Affleck Leaves

article
New SHE-RA Series Coming From Netflix

New SHE-RA Series Coming From Netflix

article

Comments

  1. Herb Malsman says:

    In June of 1994, I visited (New) Scotland Yard’s “Black Museum.” I was there to record an audio tour/interview with the Museum’s curator. We came to stand in front of a display which featured the un-retouched images of “Jack’s” victims. I mentioned the fact it was more than 100-years now, and we were no closer to knowing who he was. The curator made clear who the investigating detectives were certain their “prime” suspect was. And their ‘notes’ made their suspicions known.(*) He was Aaron Kosminski! They decided to, (until they were absolutely-certain) withhold this information from the press and, the public. Some months earlier, they detained another “person-of-interest” dubbed “Leather Apron,” also a Jew. Upon hearing the (“Leather Apron”) news, a wave of anti-Semitism shook London. As it turned-out he was shortly thereafter…released, for lack of evidence. In Kosminski’s case, he was arrested soon after Mary Kelly’s murder. Judged to be “totally unfit to plead,” and “totally unfit to stand trial.” “He was placed in a mental institution where he died 7-years later…all the murders stopped, and that was the end of that.”

    (*) I was not privy to these notes.

  2. So Sweeney Todd could have been the Ripper? lol wow. Naw, I don’t think this is factual. All it proves is that dude had relations with a hooker and he or she cleaned themselves off with the shawl before her death. It interesting that dude ended up in the nutt house tho…

  3. Diana says:

    Additionally, mitochondrial DNA types can be shared by unrelated individuals. Even if it was his DNA on the shawl, it doesn’t mean he murdered her. He could have just been availing himself of her services.