close menu
GOTHAM Review: “The Balloonman”

GOTHAM Review: “The Balloonman”

On, there’s one particular trope that comes to mind upon viewing this week’s episode of Gotham, in which detectives Gordon and Bullock are after a serial killer targeting crooked public servants by fastening them to weather balloons and launching them into the sky. It’s called “Narrowed It Down to the Guy I Recognize.” The idea is that it’s a waste of money to cast a recognizable actor as a throwaway character in any kind of whodunit, and so the characters played by such actors, no matter how innocent they may seem at first, will inevitably prove to be guilty.

Case in point: early in this episode, there’s a scene in which the young Selina Kyle is dropped off at Gordon’s police station by a character played by Dan Bakkedahl, a former correspondent on The Daily Show and a recurring actor on Veep. Sure enough, as he’s the most recognizable guest star, in the end we learn that Bakkedahl is indeed Davis Lamond, a/k/a “The Balloonman.” If that was the biggest problem plaguing this episode, it would be easy to dismiss. Alas, there are bigger ones.

Gotham‘s had a bit of a identity crisis since it premiered, in that it’s not entirely sure what kind of show it wants to be. It’s an understandable dilemma, what with seventy-five years of Batman history to draw from, from every known media, there’s plenty of conflicting tones and approaches that any show set in the Caped Crusader’s universe will have to deal with. Should it be light, dark, very dark? If it’s very dark, should it be larger-than-life like Tim Burton’s Batman or grounded like Christopher Nolan’s Dark Knight? And if it is grounded, how grim or nihilistic should it be before it stops being enjoyable?

Gotham - "The Balloonman"

The even bigger issue is one of genre. Since there’s no Batman in Gotham, the show can’t be a superhero saga. Yet it’s still escapist entertainment that wants to make use of the different types of stories that have shaped the Batman mythos. So Gotham sets out to be a gangster movie and a film noir and a police procedural and a colorful Dick Tracy-style comic-strip. All the while forgetting that no Batman story was all of these things at once.

This week we have an antagonist who, like many Batman villains, utilizes a whimsical motif in committing crimes, one that contrasts with the serious-minded MO of the story’s heroes. His balloon murders could work in an Adam West Batman story, or even a Michael Keaton Batman story, but they wouldn’t work in a Christian Bale Batman story, especially when one considers that the average weather balloon is completely incapable of hoisting an adult human being into the air. And it’s Nolan that Gotham most wants to emulate, at least on the surface.

Oswald Cobblepot also suffers from some confused writing – making his way back to Gotham, ostensibly smarter than those who cast him out of the city, yet indiscreetly killing anyone who gets in his way, or who has something he might want. Even something as trivial as a particular pair of shoes. Robin Lord Taylor continues to deliver a great performance with what he’s given, but his Oswald is just too intelligent to be making the mistakes the script demands of him.

At least, like Jim Gordon, Oswald’s given something worthwhile to do, as opposed to most of Gotham‘s women. Fish Mooney again remains in her club, fuming at the hold crime lord Carmine Falcone has on her. Gordon’s lady love Barbara Kean owns an art gallery, but we only ever see her walking around her apartment in various states of undress. And Renee Montoya – unbeknownst to Gordon, Barbara’s ex-lover and, as is revealed in this episode, fellow former junkie – demonstrates the kind of slipshod reasoning that wouldn’t get her through the police academy, let alone promoted to Major Crimes Division officer. (She believes Gordon killed Oswald because the latter is missing and because mobstress Fish Mooney tells her Gordon killed him.)

Gotham - "The Balloonman"

There’s some bittersweet warmth allowed via Bruce and Alfred’s relationship. The two get in a bit of swordplay, allowing Bruce to indulge in a childhood pastime while reminding us just how much of his childhood has been taken from him. But there’s yet another reminder of something the audience can never have – the Batman himself – as Bruce watches a TV report of the apprehended Balloonman and the on-the-site reporter asks, “Who will defend the people of Gotham?”

Plenty of TV shows take time in plotting an appropriate course or in finding their characters’ voices. And Gotham does have a good deal of potential. I could see it developing into a gritty Se7en-style crime thriller, or an Untouchables-type gangland epic about one man fighting for his soul in a city of sin. It might even be fun if it offers little more than its wacky villains-of-the-week. But, like its hero, in the end it will have to decide exactly which mission it must execute in order to survive.

Next week: The Penguin has arrived on Gordon’s doorstep, but is he friend or foe? And Fish Mooney is “looking for a weapon.” Meanwhile, the city’s Arkham district is set to be torn down and Gordon welcomes an old friend.

What did you think of this week’s episode? Let me know in the comments below or on Twitter (@JMaCabre).


Images: Fox



How THE HAUNTING OF HILL HOUSE Sets Up a Possible Season 2

How THE HAUNTING OF HILL HOUSE Sets Up a Possible Season 2

Tom Hiddleston's Drawings of Loki Are the Cutest

Tom Hiddleston's Drawings of Loki Are the Cutest



  1. Erin says:

    There are a lot of things to like about it, but some of the acting is just too campy. If they are going for camp, fine, but they need to add in some Whedon-esque one liners. The crooked cops are just too much. Jokes would help. Jim Gordon is great, but a few deadpan dry as the desert jokes would do well to bring him full circle. His place is a bit too fancy and not really believable. All of the criminals are terrific, if there are a bit too many at once. Cobblepot is terrific. Bruce and Alfred are . . . meh IMO.

  2. SpeckNasty says:

    I’m just gonna point out that the shoes were a two-for-one deal… he got the shoes, AND created the job opening.

  3. MinaKitty says:

    While it’s set in the Batman universe, there is nothing that says the tone of Gotham -has to be- anything like previous Batman stories. Sure, there’s a lot we can compare the new narrative to, but how about let a new show find its own voice? Gotham has a -lot- of potential, and it’s doing really well with the potential it has so far.

    Let Gotham be Gotham; It doesn’t have to be -like- anything else. The only thing the show is obligated to do is deliver an entertaining experience.

    • I agree with you in principle, but they’re shoehorning in so many villains, and the show is filled with not at all subtle foreshadowing, that it’s hard not to compare it to other Batman stories.

  4. lepinkainen says:

    Thanks, I just went down the tvtropes rabbit hole for an hour.

  5. Kevin says:

    “I could see it developing into a gritty Se7en-style crime thriller, or an Untouchables-type gangland epic about one man fighting for his soul in a city of sin.”

    You did notice that this episode was about killing people with weather balloons right?  This is fun Batman- not Christopher Nolan’s.

  6. I didn’t know who the guy was, but the first time he ballooned that guy I noted his sweater and then when he dropped off catwoman I was like he has the same sweater, oh its the same guy, I figured it out already. I also think they are building the show slowly. I think they know where they are going with it and what it’s going to be but unlike most shows where it starts picking up after the 3rd episode i think this will be slower. I mean you are having to cover all the origin stories and you’ll probably want to save those story arcs for later seasons. I see it being kind slow at the start but once it has momentum it’ll be good.

  7. jordan says:

    Overall I think it’s a great show.Especially when you compare it to Smallvile or Arrow. It has a few flaws but so do most shows on network TV.  I think there doing a great job with the characters.  I don’t think there’s any confused writing with Oswalds character there marking the beginning of him becoming a psychopath. 

  8. StagingLt says:

    -=sigh=-  Are there any reviewers out there, or just critics?  I swear, so many critics come across like its their job to not like something.  Please recall suspension of disbelief.  Escapism.  I find the show very entertaining, and don’t find the need to nitpick it to death.  Just enjoy it for what it is.

    • Ben says:

      Well said and I completely agree.

    • Damocles_74 says:

      A review is done by critics. Anyone else can make a re-cap which is just a condensed re-telling of the episode without any or limited personal opinions. And as it says REVIEW at the top, next time expect to read critisim.