close menu
Ted Cruz is the Last Person Who Should Control NASA’s Funding

Ted Cruz is the Last Person Who Should Control NASA’s Funding

Enriched baby food, infrared ear thermometers, freeze-dried food, cordless vacuums, solar cells, water and air purification, accurate weather prediction…These are just a few technologies, inventions, or innovations that NASA has been a part of, improved, or produced directly. And it’s the agency that first put human feet on alien soil.

Despite everything that NASA has done, everything it represents, it’s strapped. Ask the American public what share of the federal budget goes to the agency and they might say nearly one-fourth. That’s how far NASA’s efforts stretch. In reality, NASA receives around 0.5% of the federal budget. Passionate proponents like Neil deGrasse Tyson and public efforts like Penny4NASA have pleaded with us to contribute more.

Now, the US Congress just gave oversight of NASA’s budget to a man who not only doesn’t understand science, he actively seeks to slow its progress.

Senator Ted Cruz, a Republican from Texas, was just appointed as chair of the Subcommittee on Space, Science, and Competitiveness, and should be confirmed later this month. This subcommittee effectively oversees NASA operations, and is therefore in control of the funding NASA receives. It wouldn’t be a problem if Cruz fully understood and valued the impact of the agency. To his credit, Cruz was quoted as saying in 2013 that it is “critical” for the US to remain ahead in extraterrestrial matters.

However, Ted Cruz is the last person we need overseeing NASA.

The first reason is obvious: The senator has already tried to diminish the 0.5% of our budget going to the agency. Cruz tried (and failed) to cut NASA funding as recently as 2013. The second reason is more pernicious: The senator actively denies science.

In regards to climate change, Cruz has gone on record stating that, “The last 15 years, there has been no recorded warming. Contrary to all the theories that – that they are expounding, there should have been warming over the last 15 years. It hasn’t happened.”

2014 was the hottest year ever recorded.

Taken separately, Cruz’s opposition to NASA and to climate change is troublesome but not catastrophic. But considering how critical NASA is to monitoring the effects we are having on our climate, his appointment to a committee that has a huge impact on both just might be catastrophic. Time will tell, but I’m afraid what it will tell us. Science denial isn’t a pick-and-choose game. It’s a suite of beliefs, a full house hand of ignorance.

This is more than just appointing someone unqualified to judge the value of an agency; it’s giving someone who enthusiastically misunderstands the underpinnings of an agency the keys to it – like appointing an astrologer to determine the utility of the Hubble Telescope.

As Neil deGrasse Tyson feared, with Cruz overseeing NASA it may get easier and easier to stop dreaming.

Kyle Hill is the Science Editor at Nerdist Industries. Follow on Twitter @Sci_Phile.

John Cleese Recapping THE WALKING DEAD Is Simply Delightful

John Cleese Recapping THE WALKING DEAD Is Simply Delightful

Hyper Realistic Superhero Portraits Are Amazing and Terrifying

Hyper Realistic Superhero Portraits Are Amazing and Terrifying

Wolverine's LOGAN Trailer Looks Unlike Any Superhero Movie We've Seen

Wolverine's LOGAN Trailer Looks Unlike Any Superhero Movie We've Seen



  1. Nich Hustler says:

    There is a second paragraph in the article linked about Ted Cruz that actually makes a lot of sense, where he talks about Global Cooling, Global Warming and Climate Change. 

    I don’t think you’re ever going to find a perfect politician for any job. There will always be people in positions where a lot of other people will have negative things to say. 

    Meh. I got bigger things to worry about my president spent roughly $22mil of tax payer money building himself a home (read not a presidential house, his house). $22mil is a lot of money in the third world. 

  2. Alan Eskew says:

    Its like having a congress full of lawyers decide on economic issues. Oh wait…… This is a stupid hit piece. Can we have an evaluation of all sitting members on the panel, including Democrats for comparison? No? Soooo just a BS opinion hit piece? OK, yah thought so.

    • D. Wing says:

      Have to agree with you here. As for Cruz’s views on climate change the majority of them stem from the idea of “man made climate change” which despite Al Gore’s best efforts is actually still up in the air within the scientific community.  The majority of people that most say don’t believe in climate change are actual those that don’t believe we (a society that has been reducing its footprint just with new technologies because they make sense long before the UN or anyone else got involved) are the majority of the reason for any of it. 

  3. 0rionsangel says:

    Ted Cruz should be put on an island and left there

  4. Keith Emery says:

    It is silly to assume that if NASA didn’t do it no one else would.

    • Thursday says:

      …Except NASA is the one who is doing it.  This isn’t something that will turn a profit, so it’s not like private industry is interested; and relying on another nation to build facilities that have already been constructed in the US is… odd.  Petroleum-reliant Russia (and Canada, for that matter) isn’t exactly eager to promote ecology.